From each of the furniture items, the chair may be of most importance. While many other objects (save the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair should be looked upon here in the common sense, from stool to throne to derivative items such as the bench and sofa, which should be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as art and craft. The chair is not only a physical support and an aesthetic item; it historically was an indicator of social place. From the historical royal courts there were significant differences between being led to a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to sit on a stool. From the past century, the director’s or manager’s chair has risen an indicator of superior position, like in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
In its furniture purpose, the chair ranges from a wealth of different models. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since the olden days there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our lifestyle has demanded new chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair shapes have been perfected to fit to changing human desires. From its particular association with man, the chair lives to its full advantage only when used. Although it is irrelevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is seen best and fairly regarded with a person sitting on it, for chair and sitter complement each other. Thus the several limbs of a chair are given names likened to the areas of our human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary purpose of the chair is to support your body, its value is judged firstly from how completely it fulfills this practical purpose. Within the creation of a chair, the designer is bound with some static rules and principal measurements. Inside these limitations, however, the chair creator has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair covered an era of several thousand years. There are societies that held unique chair forms, expressive of the principal work in the areas of technique and design. Among these societies, special note should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of skilled make, are today seen from tomb discoveries. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs crafted like those of a particular animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. In this design a strong triangular design was made. There was in our understanding no significant change from the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical peasantry. The simple variation lied in the kind of ornamentation, in the choice of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool likely was made as an easily portable seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the form persevered until much later days. But the stool then was made for the task of a ceremonial seat, its original role as a folding stool being forgotten. This can today be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were in the shape of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats were created from wood. The easy make of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that spin on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, was then seen some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognised of this kind is the folding stool, crafted from ashwood, now seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not as any ancient object still existing but as seen from a variety of pictorial evidence. The archetype is the klismos displayed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area outside Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs could be seen. These creative legs were likely to be executed with bent wood and were therefore subjected to extreme pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints securing the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore very strong and were plainly pointed out.
The Romans adopted the Greek designs; some casts of seated Romans display designs of a thicker and in appearance somewhat less delicately built klismos. Both styles, the light or the heavy, were seen again as part of the Classicist epoch. The klismos design can be evidenced in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in particular forms of marked uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The history of the chair in China is not able to be charted as long as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of drawings and artworks was preserved, detailing the interiors and exterior of Chinese buildings and their furniture. Kept also of the 16th century are a trove of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that show an interesting resemblance to designs of older chairs.
As in Egypt, there existed two major chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair has been seen both with or without arms although never without its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to give support to the back. In one design, it has been found, the stiles were delicately curved on top of the arms so as to fit the form of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of a back). Together, all three sections had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. While the idea of the Chinese back splat exercised an influence on English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden members that could only to a limited capability embolden corner joints (as well as being loose as well) signify an element exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which closes over the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or is given rounded edges—an acknowledgement perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and might have had a plaited texture. These chairs required of the sitter to be stiff and upright; when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese households of this epoch armchairs most likely were allowed only for senior persons, for they were given great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have been brought to China from the West. It is not dissimilar that much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is intricately joined to the two legs of the stool by a curved member, which is often provided with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the resulting effect of both of these furniture styles is stylized. The structure and aesthetic parts are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual parts do not look to have been constructed by either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and fixed in its place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also left its name on the chair. Artworks display a design of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some little iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture for traveling which, during the same period, gave the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is evidenced in engravings of the inside of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this style of chair can also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not believed that the style actually originated in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in considerable amounts, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of those chairs lined up along a wall. The design asserts itself by its elegant proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The model owes its popularity to a combination of relaxation and delicacy. The seat suits to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike principles even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them are made from wood of quite thick dimensions; but every member is deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been sanded away, and more expensive designs may be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engraving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is sometimes used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more varied in form than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popular in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content