From each of the furniture objects, the chair might be of most importance. While the majority of other items (apart from the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair can be regarded here in the general sense, from stool to throne to developed makes such as a bench or sofa, which should be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as a creative art. The chair is not simply a physical support and/or aesthetic item; it is historically a symbol of social rank. At the past royal courts there were clear signifiers between having a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to cope with a stool. Since the last century, a director’s and manager’s chair has become an indicator of superior status, as well as in democratic government debate the speaker sits on a higher platform.
As a furniture form, the chair is utilised for a variety of various forms. There are chairs manufactured to suit man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to show his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). From past days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our lifestyle has demanded particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair shapes has been adapted to conform to evolving human requirements. For its particular relationship with man, the chair appears to its full advantage only when used. Though it is irrelevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau whether there might be things inside or not, a chair is seen best and clearly evaluated with a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter need each other. Thus the individual elements of a chair were named like the limbs of the human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the basic purpose of the chair is to support the body, its credit is judged primarily on how fully it measures up to this practical job. In the build of the chair, the designer is restricted in some static laws and principal measurements. In these regulations, however, the chair maker has great freedom.
The history of the chair covers an era of several thousand years. There existed cultures that made significant chair types, as expressive of the highest work in the arenas of skill and creativity. Out of these peoples, a note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of careful make, are now found from tomb discoveries. First of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair has four legs designed not unlike those of an animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. From this design a strong triangular construction was made. There was in our knowledge no significant differentiation in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common citizens. The real change existed in the intricacy of ornamentation, in the particulars of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was made for an easily packed seat for army. As a camp stool the type stayed around for much later points. But the stool then was created as the task of a ceremonial seat, its original job as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can today be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the form of folding stools but can’t be folded because the seats were made out of wood. The plain structure of the folding stool, made of two frames that turn on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, is seen but some time later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognised of these is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, which is now at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient specimen still extant but as seen in a wealth of pictorial evidence. The most recognisable is the klismos displayed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of which could be shown. These curved legs were understood to be crafted of bent wood and were therefore had to bear great pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore extremely solid and were overtly signified.
The Romans adopted the Greek style; evidence of statues of seated Romans offer chairs of a thicker and apparently slightly crudely built klismos. Both features, the light and heavy, were seen again within the Classicist era. The klismos influence is found in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in special forms of considerable originality in Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China cannot be tracked as long as in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of sketches and paintings was protected, showing the interiors and exterior of Chinese homes and the furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are a collection of chairs of wood or lacquered wood, that possess an interesting resemblance to images of previous chairs.
Same as in Egypt, two iconic chair forms existed in China: a chair that had four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair was found both with or without arms though always having a square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to support the back. In one kind, however, the stiles could be marginally curved by the arms for the purpose of suit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of its chairback). Each of the three limbs are mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Though the style of a back splat exercised an influence on English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that could only to a limited capability embolden corner joints (and furthermore were loose in the bargain) are a feature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. All members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—references perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and had on occasion a plaited form. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; if too much weight is pushed on the back, the chair has a tendency to collapse. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this epoch armchairs likely were reserved for the senior persons, for they were given great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have come to China from the West. It is akin very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a change in that the top rail is elegantly affixed to the two legs of the stool in a curved member, which is generally possessing metal mounts. From a Western understanding the overall effect of these furniture designs is stylized. The manufacture and decoration issues are combined in a way that is at the same time naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual items do not seem to have been constructed by use of either glue or screws, but have been mortised onto one another and fixed in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also left its name on the chair. Artworks show a type of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to bring up a pattern of little pads. The front board and a corresponding board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture in traveling which, during the same period, possessed the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is seen in engravings of the inside of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair may also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not decided that the form actually started in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin dimensions; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in vast numbers, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of this kind of chairs lined up against a wall. The style asserts itself by its elegant proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, as created in Paris around 1750—spread through most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of relaxation and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed on craftsmanlike principles in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof employ wood of rather thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and more upmarket examples can be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative engravings. The wood might be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is sometimes used instead of upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more open in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the premier circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and found favour in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.
Sphere: Related Content